The Royal Society

Sunday 28 March 2010 02:00 BST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In last week's article 'Women in science' the titles of the two boxes naming women scientists was mixed up. The Royal Society had named 10 women scientists from the past in a 'top ten' but they did not include any living scientists in their list. The box which included names of living people, and which was incorrectly headed 'the Royal Society top ten', was a selection chosen by the Independent on Sunday and not the Royal Society. We are sorry for this mix-up.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Stay up to date with notifications from The?Independent

Thank you for registering

The Royal Society

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering